![]() The colour isn't perfect for me and it does have a slight tendency towards creasing, however I still really like this concealer and think it's a viable alternative to the Urban Decay. It's also a little more watery in texture when compared to the 'fluffiness' of Naked Skin. I'd say it's a tiny bit lighter coverage than the Urban Decay offering but it has a similar hydrating, easy-to-blend formula that's perfect for summertime. This is my dupe for the Urban Decay and for a drugstore concealer it comes in an impressive selection of colours. Whilst makeup of course can't 'erase' the raised texture of breakouts, these two will make them as invisible as possible. ![]() Either of these are miraculous at covering red, angry blemishes. So, which one do I recommend? If you're willing to invest then definitely the Nars, however if you can find a colour match in the Collection, then go for that as a blemish concealer as it really is impressive for such an affordable product. I do also find it wears off a lot during the day if used under the eyes. ![]() It comes in a very limited colour range, which is the main reason I get very little use out of mine (this is the darkest shade it comes in). It's incredible on blemishes but I think it's too much under the eyes (even moreso than the Nars). It's really tricky to find a full-coverage drugstore concealer, especially in a creamy formula so this one has a cult following. I know everyone says the Maybelline is a dupe for the Nars but in my opinion, the formulas are completely different and this is the closest alternative on the high street. My drugstore dupe for the Nars is Collection's Lasting Perfection.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |